If search engines can't crawl and index your pages properly, content and links can only do so much. We fix the crawl, indexation, structured data and performance issues that cap how much of your site can rank.
Quick answer
Technical SEO services make sure search engines can crawl, render, index and understand a website. The work covers site architecture and internal links, crawl budget, canonical tags and redirects, XML sitemaps, JavaScript rendering, structured data and Core Web Vitals. A technical SEO audit finds the issues; implementation fixes them so content and links can deliver their full value.
Common challenges
Technical problems rarely announce themselves. These are the ones we find most often on sites that have stopped growing.
Large numbers of "Crawled, currently not indexed" or "Duplicate without user-selected canonical" pages in Search Console usually point to thin or duplicated templates.
If key text or links load client-side, search engines have to render the page to see them. That delays indexing and sometimes misses content entirely.
Years of redesigns leave chains of redirects and links to dead pages, wasting crawl activity and leaking link value.
Canonicals pointing to redirected pages, sitemaps listing non-canonical URLs and internal links to the wrong version all send mixed signals.
Lab scores can look fine while real users on mobile networks get slow loads and layout shifts. Field data tells the true story.
What’s included
Crawl simulation, log file analysis and manual review surface every structural issue affecting indexation and rankings, prioritized by impact.
We find duplicate, thin and orphaned pages and fix the canonical, redirect and sitemap issues behind them, so crawlers reach your important pages.
Schema markup for products, articles, organizations, services and FAQs, built to qualify for rich results and to be clear to AI answer engines.
We diagnose real performance bottlenecks (render-blocking scripts, heavy assets, slow server response, client-side rendering) using field data from real visitors as well as lab tests.
Redirect maps, staging audits and post-launch monitoring for redesigns, platform changes and domain moves.
Rendering checks for React, Next.js, Vue and other JavaScript sites, with server-side or static rendering recommended where it's needed.
Our process
Crawl, log file and Search Console analysis plus manual review of templates and rendering.
Issues ranked by revenue impact and implementation effort, so engineering time goes to the fixes that pay back first.
We work with your developers or directly in your CMS to ship fixes correctly, and verify each one after it goes live.
Ongoing crawl and Search Console monitoring catches new issues before they turn into ranking losses.
Why FluxSEO Pro
We implement fixes ourselves or write tickets your developers can pick up, then verify each one after release.
Alliance Shipping's average position moved from #42 to #10 in 16 months, with Search Console data guiding each round of optimization.
Each issue comes with the pages affected, the expected impact and the effort involved, so engineering time goes where it pays back.
Reporting
We measure technical work by how much more of your site search engines can reach and rank.
Related services

Zega Apparel's work started with crawl and indexing issues, duplicate metadata and Core Web Vitals gaps, giving it a scalable technical foundation before content and link building.
View case studyClient feedback
FluxSEO Pro helped us clean up our technical SEO and improve the visibility of our product pages. We started seeing more relevant organic traffic within a few months, and our overall search performance has improved significantly.
We needed more than just keyword optimization. FluxSEO Pro worked on our technical structure, content strategy, and landing pages, which gave us a much clearer SEO direction. The quality of our organic leads has improved noticeably.
Our website had strong information but wasn’t performing well in search. FluxSEO Pro helped restructure our content and improve the technical side of the website. We’ve seen better visibility for several of our important services.
FAQ
Our technical SEO audit covers crawlability and robots rules, indexation and canonicals, redirects and status codes, XML sitemaps, site architecture and internal links, JavaScript rendering, structured data, mobile usability and Core Web Vitals, plus server log analysis on larger sites.
Google's "good" thresholds, measured at the 75th percentile of real page loads, are Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) of 2.5 seconds or less, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) of 200 milliseconds or less, and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) of 0.1 or less.
According to Google, crawl budget mainly matters for very large sites (around a million or more unique pages) or medium sites with 10,000+ pages that change daily, and for sites with many URLs Google finds but hasn't indexed. Smaller sites usually have indexation or quality issues instead.
An audit gives you a list of issues. This service includes implementation support: we prioritize the fixes, work with your developers and verify they shipped correctly.
Yes. Post-migration recovery is one of the most common technical SEO emergencies. We check redirects, canonicals, indexation and templates against the old site to find what was lost.
Crawl and indexation improvements are often measurable within 4 to 6 weeks. Ranking and traffic gains compound over the following quarters.
Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools, Screaming Frog for crawling, PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse and Chrome DevTools for speed and rendering, the Rich Results Test for structured data, and Ahrefs or Semrush for backlink and competitor data. On larger sites we add server log analysis. Tools find patterns; a person decides what matters.
The first round of fixes often is. After that, releases, new templates, plugins and content keep introducing issues, so most sites benefit from ongoing monitoring even when the heavy lifting is done.
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) replaced First Input Delay as a Core Web Vital in March 2024. It measures how quickly a page responds to clicks, taps and key presses throughout a visit, and a good score is 200 milliseconds or less.
Want the detail? Read our guide
Tell us about your site and goals. We’ll come back with specific opportunities, not a generic proposal.